Next: Molecular evolution of self-incompatibility
Up: research
Previous: research
Subsections
Because selfed offspring are generally less vigorous than outcrossed
offspring (inbreeding depression), early naturalists thought that the
evolution of self-fertilization must be maladaptive.
However, Fisher (1941) proposed a two-fold transmission advantage of
selfing; two sets of genes are transmitted to each offspring through
selfing, whereas a single set is transmitted through outcrossing. This
strong selection for selfing (automatic selection) leads to the
fixation of completely selfing genotypes unless there is a
counteracting selective force such as severe inbreeding depression.
More recent coevolutionary models, where mating system and level of
inbreeding depression are allowed to evolve simultaneously, have shown
that the dynamics of mating-system evolution can be more complex than
previously suspected. However, many aspects of these coevolutionary
models remain untested.
One untested aspect of the coevolutionary theory was the existence of
an association between a modifier locus controlling selfing rate and
viability (inbreeding depression). Using an annual plant endemic to
California, Gilia achilleifolia (Polemoniaceae), as a model
system, I showed that the degree of herkogamy (spatial separation
between anther and stigma) influences selfing rate of individual
plants within a population with isozyme analysis (Takebayashi and
Delph in prep). Considering herkogamy to be a selfing rate modifier,
we provided the first evidence for an association between a floral
trait controlling the selfing rate and level of inbreeding depression
within a population (Takebayashi and Delph 2000). However, a
number of questions remain, such as the genetic basis of this
association, which I plan to investigate next.
At a higher taxonomic level, I examined current phylogenetic data to
determine if self-fertilization is an evolutionary dead-end. This
study was motivated by the question: why do most plants outcross (only
20-25% of plant taxa are predominantly selfing) if the advantage of
selfing (automatic selection) is so large? One potential answer is
that selfing may have a short-term transmission advantage, but that it
is an evolutionary dead-end in the long term. This is because the loss of
genetic diversity may preclude adaptive evolution, including reversion
from selfing to outcrossing.
My review of the literature and re-analysis of existing data,
published in American Journal of Botany as a Special Invited Paper
(Takebayashi and Morrell 2001), suggests that this old hypothesis is
well supported in light of current evolutionary genetic theory.
Furthermore, it appears that most of the current phylogenetic data are
in concordance with the hypothesis; that is, selfing taxa seem to be
in terminal clades. However, the large-scale phylogenetic data that
could be used to quantitatively assess the hypothesis are not yet
available. In collaboration with Dr. Peter Morrell, I have started a
preliminary phylogenetic analysis of Gilia species to overcome
the pitfalls which we identified in previous studies.
Using a simulation model, I investigated the effects of polygenic
inheritance of the selfing rate on the consequence of mating-system
evolution. This study was motivated by the discrepancy between
current models and empirical observations in plants. Most models
describing the evolution of selfing rate assume that selfing rate is
controlled by a single locus, whereas, in reality, many floral traits
influence selfing rate and each of these traits is polygenic. I found
that under polygenic inheritance, the optimal selfing rate may not be
always realized if the population size is finite (Takebayashi and
Repasky in prep). Furthermore, deviations from the optimal selfing
rates depended on the underlying genetic architecture; that is, how
multi-locus genotype get mapped to the phenotype (selfing-rate).
Next: Molecular evolution of self-incompatibility
Up: research
Previous: research
Naoki Takebayashi
2003-12-24